Tuesday, March 10, 2009

WATCHMEN

“WATCHMEN” (Billy Crudup, Jackie Earle Haley, Patrick Wilson, Malin Akerman & Matthew Goode)

Let me try to explain this film to the movie-goers from my generation (Born in 1960 or
earlier) . . . Xena, the Warrior Princess is in love with a Big Glowing Blue Rooster /
Don McLean (of ‘American Pie’ fame, not the ex-NBA player) dresses up like a gay hawk & has a secret crush on Xena /
Meanwhile, grown-up Danny Partridge is running around town doing Clint Eastwood impersonations with a gunny sack over his head /
Shaun Cassidy (Keith Partridge’s real-life brother) plays the smartest guy in the world &, like all effeminate Mensa members, is a master of martial arts /
Robert Downey, Jr.’s much less talented older brother plays ‘The Comedian’ who, oddly enough, doesn’t do or say anything remotely funny /
Later, when Danny Bonaduce is sent to prison, we are shocked to discover that the transgender loving punk turns out to be the baddest ass to ever set foot in prison; “I’m not locked in here with you, YOU’RE LOCKED IN HERE WITH ME!” Little Danny bellows after deep fat frying a large black inmate that was about to give him the shiv. Then after the inmates gain control of the prison (We’re not told how, it apparently isn’t one of those factors we needed to know) Kelly Leak, er, I mean, Danny Partridge pummels pro wrassler Haystack Calhoun & then flushes Kramer’s dwarf buddy from ‘Seinfeld’ like he was just another dump /
Finally, Bob Hope’s corpse plays Richard Milhous Nixon, the President that cares so much about mankind he’s re-elected 5 times... Yes, folks, this IS quite a far-fetched fantasy!
Yes, all of you comic book lovers can sneer & boo at your computer screens & mumble how this idiot writer doesn’t ‘get’ the underlying concept of what ‘Watchmen’ is really about, but I can only report what I perceive, & as I watched this 2 hour forty-five minute long fiasco unfold, the voices in my head kept yelling “Enough already!”
Enough of the graphic shots of the Big Glowing Blue Rooster; Dr. Long Island doesn’t wear pants – Okay! I get it! Let’s just show the nature lover from the waist up then! Enough of the gory scenes of violence created solely to appease the ‘slasher’ film crowd. Enough with these supposedly ‘normal’ humans that like to dress up like superheroes taking on dozens of armed gang members with just their bare hands & coming out victorious, & without a scratch. Does anyone actually feel ‘entertained’ by watching elongated fight scenes? The film constantly goes from super slo-mo to incredibly FF to stop action to normal speed to super slo-mo, FF, stop, normal; it does this so many times I lost count of how many Enough Already’s went off in my head.
The underlying plot of World War 3 looming between the Russians & the U.S. was intriguing, but NOT with America being the home of the Big Glowing Blue Rooster, the only actual Watchman with super powers - Unimaginatively enough brought about by a radiation experiment gone awry. BGBR (AKA Dr. Manhattan) has the ability to transport himself anywhere in the universe; grow as big as a mountain & obliterate human beings with a wave of his hand (Would have made more sense if he disintegrated people by shooting a ray from his mighty Blue Rooster, at least that would explain why he felt the need to have the thing poking out all of the time) So Dr. Manhattan is a walking invincible nuclear reactor with the ability to destroy the entire planet, should he choose... Why then, would the Soviet Union escalate the Cold War to Def-Con 1 proportions, knowing the U.S. had this ultimate weapon of mass destruction?
So the part of the film that showed some promise didn’t make any sense. I also liked the idea of ‘masked’ vigilantes (ala Batman) actually existing – the premise, as I understood it was that these costumed crime fighters were being assassinated one at a time & the Danny Partridge character, Rorschach was the only one concerned about it & the film would be about his attempts to both stay alive & unravel the mystery. Unfortunately it doesn’t live up to that promise. It is SO FAR OUT there, it’s silly. It would be different if it were set in the future – when people were so bored with comic book movie sequels that they decide to create their own real-life costumed heroes & then bring in the mystery of ‘Who is killing them off & why?’ – then you’ve got an intriguing concept on your hands, but being set in the 80’s detracts from the ‘fantasy’ – We KNOW none of this nonsense took place, so no, it was impossible to lose myself in the fantasy. Sorry, comic book fans, but this, the most celebrated comic book in the history of mankind, is a total failure as a film.
If I were to praise it at all, it would be to say it WAS ambitious – there’s no question about that & I’m sure those of you that enjoy this type of crap (Spiderman, X Men, Friday the 13th) will absolutely love this because there is plenty of mindless violence & unnecessary special effects to keep your eyes busy (That is as long as you like looking at Big Blue Roosters) But I walked away thinking it was written by someone with an over active imagination that doesn’t know when to back off & a director that pounds & pounds one outlandish scene after another into your brain thinking it will pass as entertainment.
Now, for the item that bugged me – Rorschach wears a sack over his head that continually changes from one ink blot to another – I thought that was clever – but they don’t explain how it does that – Nor how does Danny Bonaduce see thru it?
Is it explained in the comic book? & yes, people, they ARE comic books – If you want to divulge into your own fantasy world by calling them ‘graphic novels’, that of course is your privilege, but don’t expect the rest of us to humor you. If it’s a picture book where what the characters are saying is printed inside a balloon – it’s a comic book! Call them ‘Illustrated Stories’, I’ll go along with that – but don’t insult me by using the word novel. A co-worker (Who loved ‘Watchmen’) told me he heard that the film makers used the comic books as their storyboard. & if that’s the case – then you have to call every storyboard for every movie ever made a ‘graphic novel’. . . I rest my case.
Prior to this century the only comic book movie I liked was ‘Superman 2’. In the 21st century, I’ve liked 3 of them – ‘Batman Begins’, ‘Iron Man’ & ‘The Dark Knight’(over-rated though it be) That is why I gave ‘Watchmen’ a shot. I knew the basic premise & kept hearing how it ‘wasn’t for kids’ - & yet there were plenty of them in the theatre – what does that tell you about modern day parents? “A violent comic book movie with swearing & nudity? Sure, kids, I’ll take you to see THAT!”

3 comments:

movie luva said...

Hey... you're back !

I had a feeling I'd be the first regular to post a comment. Maybe the others are " afraid " to disagree with you, and maybe they are waiting to see the first person to chime in.

I was a fan of the book and I liked the movie. Didn't disappoint me one bit. It didn't blow me away, I will admit to that. But Zack Snyder pulled off something special I believe. Terry Gilliam, who has a terrific imagination, said if he directed it, the film would have to be 5 hours. Huge fan of the graphic novel, director Darren Aronofsky took a stab at it and said it was not adaptable. Other movie makers tried their hand at it and said it wasn't possible. So I give Snyder mad props because he pulled it off.

First off, it doesn't do any good to try and pick it apart because it's a fantasy piece. Pure fiction. It's asking you to leave the literal aspect of your imagination at the door and just go for the ride. I knew this film would be pretty much divided on those who really liked it or did not. There doesn't seem to be any middle ground.

I also thought Jackie Earle Haley did a good job. He's been in Hollywood forever and knows the camera. I'm glad he's back to acting full time. I also thought Jeffrey Dean Morgan was good as The Comedian too. I too felt too much Dr. Manhatten but I kind of new that was going to happen.

I enjoyed the movie, but it's way too early to say if it will make my top 10 of 2009 though.

Kurt said...

A new movie review. How long was it ?

Anyway,I liked Watchman. Not the best I have ever seen and I don't think it was better than The Dark Knight though. Heath's performance really lifted that movie to a higher level I thought. I enjoyed it though. But I do think Earle Haley is making a nice comeback. And he was clearly the best performer in the movie I think. And I'm sure the performance as The Comedian will get Jeffrey Dean Morgan some higher profile jobs now. Malin Ackerman can't act her way out of a paper bag though. She's only there because she is eye candy.
But as for an straight up action film goes, I thought it was pretty good. I don't try to dig way too deep into fantasy film's because that's just what they are, a fantasy. I kind of give that genre of movies a bit of a pass. It's not real in the first place. It's supposed to be weird and bizarre.
So, what will Mr Reid's first real positive revierw be of 2009 ? Could it be Sunshine Cleaning ? Maybe Duplicity? Yes, Duplicity it will be I say. There's got to be one coming down the chute he likes.

Terry R said...

Well, there was nothing out worth paying to see - I initially didn't plan on seeing 'Watchmen' in its first week, but we were starved for entertainment!
Gosh, I hope no one is 'afraid' to disagree with me, I feel that's part of the fun of having this blog! & trust me, I'm USED to being the guy who goes against the grain.
The problem with this particular 'fantasy' is that it's set in the recent past. Kind of hard to delve into a 'fantasy world' where its the 1980's & the president was an actual president.
Even though I didn't enjoy the movie, it isn't Bottom 10 material.
Oddly enough 2009 is continuing where '08 left off, in answer to Kurt's question as to what film will be the first I like in '09 because I was the only person apparently that enjoyed 'Inkheart'. & 'The International' wasn't as bad as I made it sound in my review - just a couple of things bugged me about it. I am looking forward to 'Sunshine Cleaning', but not 'Duplicity' - it has a huge strike against it going in - the lead actress.