Tuesday, March 24, 2009

DUPLICITY

“DUPLICITY” (Clive Owen, Julia Roberts, Paul Giamatti & Tom Wilkinson)

A better actress in the female lead & you’d have a nifty, intelligent con flick here. Actually, this is a nifty, intelligent con flick which is saying something these days, because, even though it was easy to tell that the con had its flaws & there were already multiple twists in the plot that made you leery of just how many more twists were coming – I liked how it ended.
Clive Owen as Ray Koval; an ex-spy turned get rich quick schemer carries the film. Giamatti & Wilkinson as rival corporate bigwigs do command the screen (especially Giamatti) but they’re the icing on the cake, it is Owen’s character that keeps you interested in what’s taking place. Appearing at times to be highly intelligent & a step ahead of the rest, Ray also has his moments of looking like a complete idiot – seemingly being duped by Julia Roberts’ Claire; another ex-spy turned... well, we don’t really know what she is until the final scenes. Clive has the much more difficult role & simply makes Roberts look like an inferior actor.
The dialogue, as they like to say, is ‘snappy’, but even with the witty repartee the scenes with Ray & Claire are the ones that fall flat. I would liked to have seen Roberts switch roles with Carrie Preston, who plays a corporate secretary that Ray seduces to gain inside info on the company she works for. Carrie was pretty, spunky, naive & ultimately broken when discovering the cute doctor she met in the bar screwed her in more ways than one. The only problem then would have been, can Roberts handle the bit part? . . . My guess is no, she couldn’t.
To reveal too much of the plot would be spoiling the fun because ‘misleading’ is the key word to practically every scene. Other than Roberts, my only complaint would be the irritating ‘flashbacks’ – About every fifteen minutes up pops the dreaded ‘Two Months Earlier...’ caption. Followed by ‘Two Weeks Earlier’, ‘Two Days Earlier’, ‘Two Minutes Earlier’... Okay, I’m exaggerating, but you know what I mean. The things is, just like director Tony Gilroy’s first film, “Michael Clayton”, in the end it all comes together nicely & most of the questions are answered. But if it helps you to decide whether or not this movie might be one you’d want to see – here’s the layout in a nutshell... Mmmm, nut shells... In the beginning Gilroy created Ray & Claire; two corporate spies that have a brief history (she duped him years earlier) Ray convinces Clair that he won’t get fooled again & she reluctantly agrees to work with him. Claire works for Wilkinson’s company which is about to unleash a product that's guaranteed to make billions. Ray works for Giamatti’s company that may possibly go bankrupt if they don’t discover what this secret product is & steal it. There’s your basic premise, but it does become somewhat entangled as each flashback reveals more & more about what’s really going on between Ray & Claire. If you’re afraid because Owen & Giamatti teamed in the exceptionally dumb ‘Shoot ‘Em Up’, have no fear with ‘Duplicity’ – If anything this script may be a little TOO clever.
Now that I think of it, Owen & Roberts appeared in the exceptionally boring ‘Closer’, didn’t they? But Clive, at least, redeems himself – he is excellent; & Paul, Tom & Carrie all deliver top notched performances as well.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

I really liked this movie. It kept you interested as well and made you think, but not in the sort of way that gives you a headache or makes you feel stupid. Tony Gilroy is being bandied about as one of the best screenwriter/filmmakers in Hollywood these days.

I do have one thing I have to ask. Why such disdain for Julia Roberts ? I wouldn't go as far to say she is my favorite actress ( that is saved for Laura Linney, Emily Watson and Meryl Streep ) but I hardly think she is bad.
I can think of some good performances I thought she was just fine in right off the the top of my head, in Sleeping With The Enemy, The Mexican and America's Sweetheart's. But her shining moment is in Erin Brockovich and winning the Best Actress Oscar. I also thought she was just fine in this part. It's a very involved and a difficult script and heavy on dialogue which she had no problem handling, and her character came off as confidant, almost cocky against Owen's Ray.

But at least you liked the movie and you can probably really give most of that credit to Tony Gilroy, the brain behind the whole thing.

Anonymous said...

Hey... he's back ! What was it, two weeks ? That's the longest you have gone going back to your KJR days.

I liked the movie too. I'm really impressed with Gilroy's writing. Especially a double cross caper. Those aren't easy to write.

I too don't get the hate on Roberts, as I have enjoyed plenty of movies she has been in. But to each his own I guess. What actresses do you like ?

Glad to see you back. It felt like such a long time.

Anonymous said...

There just hasn't been anything out lately & I'm working weekends now so that cuts into my movie excursions as well.
Movieluva is going to hate me for this quote, but I am always reminded of a line Dudley Moore said in one of those crappy films he made after 'Arthur' - "Why are there no decent parts for actresses in movies? - Because you have to hire a woman to play them."
As chauvenistically piggy that sounds, there is a measure of truth in it - Men are better at acting than women are - I guess from throwing out all those bulls-- lines we use to try & seduce you ladies. Laura Linney is one of my favorites, I will go see anything she is in. I haven't seen manu Emily Watson films, but everytime I do, I'm impressed. Meryl, we've discussed before - I think she's over-rated; tends to over-act - though I thought she was incredible in 'Doubt'. Part of the problem I have with Julia Roberts is she tends to have the same facial expressions & mannerisms in all of her characters - THAT is clearly a lack of range. I also don't find her to be very attractive - part of what spoiled an otherwise terrific movie in 'Duplicity' is that I never bought for a second that someone as suave & handsome as Clive Owen would be attractive to a bug-eyed slug-lipped 'older' woman. Now, that doesn't mean a woman has to be good looking to be a decent actress, it's just when they're deemed 'gorgeous' & I don't see the attraction, it makes me scratch my head. & yes, I realize, it isn't HER fault that others dub her a great beauty - but she does seem to have that air about her of 'aren't I something special?'...
& that turns me off. I actually thought she did a good job in 'Charlie Wilson's War'-a film I was disappointed didn't get an Oscar nomination. Probably because of the briefness of her role, so I didn't have time to get sick of her...
To answer Kurt - I like a lot of actresses, really! I think Cate Blanchett may be the best in the business right now. Naomi Watts, Charlize Theron, Susan Sarandon, Tilda Swinton, Dakota Fanning, Francis McDormand, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Christina Ricci, I thought Angelina Jolie should have won this year for 'Changeling', Amy Adams & Rachel McAdams are climbing up the ladder with every film I see them in. Jodie Foster, Patricia Clarkson, Nicole Kidman, Kiera Knightly, Hope Davis... are just the ones I can name from just looking at the titles of the movies I've seen in the last year or so. I used to think Jane Fonda was an excellent actress until her comeback in 2 of the worst movies ever made (Monster-In-Law & Georgie Rule) I liked Meg Ryan when she was adorable. Ellen Burstyn 'back in the day'. I first found out I wasn't gay when I saw Kim Novak in 'Bell, Book & Candle' as a kid. I could go on & on - just as I could in naming actresses that I can't imagine how they keep getting hired. Name me some of your favorites & I'll tell you what I think - You will get an honest opinion from me as I think you know by now, I don't hold back any punches... Gee, that makes me sound like a wife-beater, doesn't it? Okay, ignore the 'punches' line or my wife's going to lock me out of the house again...

movie luva said...

Well, let me see. I tend to be a compartmentalizer, so I have actresses that are senior citizens that I still like, then I have my favorites that are slightly pre senior citizen, and I have the young or in their 20's and 30's favorites.

So I'll begin with the seniors. Some that are still working that I will still see their film's are Vanessa Redgrave ( R.I.P. Natasha-she would have made my list ) Shirly MacLaine, Judi Dench, Ellen Burstyn, Julie Andrews, Diane Keaton, Maggie Smith and Marsha Mason. I agree with Fonda's latest work, but she was something in the 70's and 80's.

Now for the vet's that in mid of their career...
I like Cate Blanchett is the best middle age working actress at this time then I would go with Laura Linney, Emily Watson, Kate Winslet ( very good in Heavenly Creatures and Iris ) Juliette Binoche, Lena Olin, Charlize Theron, Emma Thompson, Michelle Pfeiffer, Francis McDormand, Julianne Moore, Jodie Foster, Naomi Watts and Hillary Swank when in good written material. Like you, I feel Keira Knightley and Rachel McAdams are coming along and getting better. I think indie vet's like Parker Posey, Lili Taylor and Amanda Plummer are rarely bad in projects they are in.

Now for the actresses that are leaning ever so close to the senior circuit who I feel still do solid work are, Jessica Lange, Sigourney Weaver, Angelica Huston, Judy Davis, Diane Wiest, Glenn Close, Sally Field, Lindsay Crouse and Helen Mirren.

So there you be, I hope you are indolent enough in that this was easy on you.

Kurt said...

Well, since movie luva stole my thunder ( how many times as a radio engineer has Terry heard that line ? ) I'll mention the actors instead the missus.

There are many talented thespian's gracing the movie screen since the inception of film, but I truly feel as of this day, in this year of 2009, the best actor is two indivisual's actually. Now, I'm talking right now, not 7 years ago, or 11 years ago or whatever. 2009. Now.

There are two, and that's Sean Penn and Daniel Day-Lewis. What a treat it would be to see these two in the same film ( with dialogue from a great writer no less ! ) having them riffing off eachother. It may never happen and that's a shame for us movie viewer's.

I say these two are the best as of now, because they have always showed very much talent and believability in thier roles, but what sets them a tad apart from the rest is that they seem to be only be getting better if that's possible, and it looks like it is.

It was really educating and informing when I read that Sean Penn interview in Rolling Stone, where he admitted he was so refreshed and happy when he saw Daniel do the Plainview character, because he said that if you are an actor worth any salt at all and care about the craft, that performance is one that you set the bench mark with and ignites the fuse. Just when you think you have done your own best work and can settle and coast, you see that performance in There Will Be Blood and it makes you want to be a better actor, and that it's still limitless in ways you can become better or improve as an actor. He also mentioned that performance by DDL was his muse and template when getting ready for the role of Harvey Milk.

Penn also admitted that he felt that his role in All The Kings Men was one of his best and when it wasn't recieved very well, that when he was preparing for Milk, he was going to take it to another level this time ( method ? )than he had ever done previously. And he essentially became Harvey Milk.

Though I can do without musicals, I will see Nine for none other reason than to be able to see Day-Lewis sing and that it's a great cast of women too. It's one thing if you have a singer that learns to act. It's another if an actor can actually sing.

As for Penn, he is nearing 50 and he has three projects on his itinerary. The Three Stooges ( disaster ? ) the Naomi Watts project and something else that's escaping me right now. I feel in several years he will retire from being in front of the camera to going full time being behind the camera and that's not such a bad thing either. I'm excited about the Terrence Malick hushed about Tree Of Life. Though I just wonder what they are trying to do with a Three Stooges project. It kind if scares me because it's the Farrely brothers directing. They haven't made a good film since Me, Myself and Irene. How long ago was that ? I'm iffy on this one. The casting isn't bad, it's how they decide to present the story it is my concern.

The next actor's on the list for me that I think are very good are Denzel Washington, Russell Crowe, Edward Norton, Anthony Hopkins, Jeff Bridges, Ben Kingsley, Gary Oldman, Ralph Fiennes, Philip Seymour Hoffman and Morgan Freeman ( though he does way too many play for pay roles )

Next tier would be Tom Hanks ( would have been on my top list a decade ago ), Paul Giamatti, Kevin Spacey ( what happened to him lately though ) Nick Nolte, Mickey Rourke, Will Smith, Tom Wilkinson, Samuel L. Jackson ( see Morgan Freeman )Actors who are improving in my mind are Leonardo Di Caprio and Josh Brolin.

I didn't count Robert De Niro or Al Pacino because it looks like they have mailed it in these days and Jack Nicholson and Michael Caine seem to be in semi-retirement, or they would have been 1,2,3,4 for me 20 years ago.

There's my best actors list as of 2009.

Terry R said...

For the most part - very impressive lists. I could pick out the few 'hacks', but why go that route? I do have to comment on Marsha Mason - I recently printed out lists of every actor that has been nominated for an Academy Award since 1955 (my lifetime) & was surprised to see how many times Mason had been nominated. Other than a decent showing in "Goodbye Girl", I don't remember seeing her in anything else meaningful. I should have mentioned Helen Mirren when I was naming actresses I admired - perhaps I excluded her because she WAS in 'Caligula'(?) The fact that her performance in 'The Clearing' was nominated for Best Supporting was a crime - she was my choice to win that year. & the thing with Kiera Knightly (to me) is that she started out showing a ton of promise, but has been stuck in a rut of bad period piece films - I want more roles like 'The Jacket' - She stole that very weird movie with her performance.
On the male side - Sean Penn knocked Jack out of #1 for me with 'Dead Man Walking'.
I like Will Smith - I think he makes good choices (except why didn't he tell the makers of Hancock to do something ELSE with the last 45 minutes?) but would I call him a great actor? I pay money to see him because he picks projects that peek my interest & he usually delivers, but I've never been blown away by his acting abilities.
Just saw a preview for the latest Michael Caine movie which looks very promising, so don't write the old English geezer off yet, Kurt.
DeNiro has always trumped Pacino in my mind & I actually think the 3Stooges movie has splendid possibilities - Never was a fan of their slapstick(or is it slapface?) style of comedy, but I seem to recall their story being filled with tragedy - It could be big time Oscar bait, esp. with the cast. Thanks for the lists - Anyone else care to weigh in on their favorite actors, please do...

Kurt said...

Hey, was that new Michael Cain movie called Is There Anybody There ? You say it's looks promising ? I haven't seen the trailer yet.

movie luva said...

Where is everybody ? There used to be a lot of different people chiming in. Oh well, I thought since I only did the women, I'll follow Kurt and Terry on their favorite actors.

Like I said in a comment previously, I lamented that I tend to compartmentalize things like this. I have actors that I like from thier 20's to 70 and over.

So I'll make my list starting with the young guys.

20 and over are... Gael Garcia Bernal, Jay Baruchel ( good in Tropic Thunder as Kevin and as Danger in Million Dollar Baby )Orlando Bloom, Ben Foster, Ryan Gosling, Jake Gyllenhaal, Colin Hanks, Emile Hirsch, Joseph Gordon-Levitt.

30 and over

Christain Bale, Gerard Butler, Matt Damon, Leonardo Dicaprio, Ioan Gruffadd ( YO-un GRIH-fith )
Ethan Hawke, Jude Law, Ryan Reynolds ( yes, I think he is more than just a pretty face ) Rufus Sewell, Henry Thomas.

40 and over

Javier Bardem, Robert Downey Jr., Don Cheadle, Russell Crowe, Johnny Depp, Paul Giamatti, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Edward Norton, Sean Penn, Benicio Del Toro.

50 and over

Chris Cooper, Tom Hanks, Ed Harris, Daniel Day-Lewis, William H. Macy, John Malkovich, Viggo Mortensen, Kurt Russell, Kevin Spacey, Denzel Washington.

60 and over

Jeff Bridges, Robert De Niro, Richard Dreyfuss, Tommy Lee Jones, Ben Kingsley, Jeremy Irons, Bill Nighy, Al Pacino, Christopher Walken, Tom Wilkinson.

70/80 and over

Michael Caine, Robert Duvall, Albert Finney, Morgan Freeman, Philip Baker Hall, Dustin Hoffman, Anthony Hopkins, Jack Nicholson, Peter O' Toole ( over 80 ) Jon Voight.

Did you wear your indolent suit ?

Terry R said...

Okay, the indolent suit comes off! Oh-oh, now you can see my girdle... Oh well, from your list of favorites, movie luva, I'd say the best actors are in their 40's right now, since the only one I wouldn't call 'exceptional' is Depp. Must admit I didn't realize the same guy that played Danger was also in Tropic Thunder, so that shows the guy has already shown 'range' (But then again, so did Leonardo at first)
Orlando Bloom is still in his
20's? & you think he's a quality actor? May I ask why? I'm not saying he stinks, I just wouldn't think to list him with the upper echelon actors.
I question Gerard Butler in the
30's group - I've seen him be both good & bad. & I don't know what surprises me more; that you think Ryan Reynolds can act, or that you think that plastic, heavily made up face of his is 'pretty'...
Boy, the 50's group is quite impressive as well - I used to like Kurt Russell, but since I just watched him in one of the worst pieces of crap I've ever seen, I'd question his inclusion.
Jeff Bridges is hit & miss, he's looked pretty pathetic in some roles. & Al Pacino stopped being 'inventive' in the
mid-80's... Speaking of mid-80's, I wouldn't dare pick on any of the senior citizen actors you named...
& yes, Kurt, the Michael Caine preview I saw was for "Is Anybody There?" - Don't know why because there wasn't a cat in it, but for some reason I thought it had a "Harry & Tonto" feel to it.