Saturday, October 11, 2008

BODY OF LIES

“BODY OF LIES” (Leonardo DiCaprio & Russell Crowe)
For the first 45 minutes or so of ‘Body Of Lies’ I felt like I was stuck in another ‘Syriana’; just a convoluted mess of a movie that shifts from scene to scene by telling us nothing more than the name of the city/building in which the segment we’re about to watch takes place. Discerning the bad guys from the good guys is nearly impossible & characters are introduced via quickie bio’s on a computer monitor, inserted into the storyline briefly & then shown as corpses that have been dumped like yesterday’s trash... But one thing kept this film from falling into that whirlwind of confusion – DiCaprio’s Roger Ferris is in practically every scene – he’s the constant that keeps the plot from becoming too bogged down with too many, “Who was that guy?” “Why did they kill him?” & “Just what in the heck is going on here?” questions.
Ferris is a CIA operative working the entire Middle East; wherever his contact in Washington needs him – that’s where he goes. Crowe plays the contact, Ed Hoffman; an overweight family man with a graying crew cut (Is this where Russell’s character from L.A. Confidential finally wound up?) who is constantly on the phone with Ferris. He drops the kids off at soccer practice while listening to his agent in the field call him 3 and 4 syllabled filthy names for not protecting someone who helped them – thus ending up in the morgue or a pile of garbage. Some accomplices are used without their knowledge & are placed in harms way by the ‘good guys’. & when they turn up missing, Crowe’s Hoffman can just shrug it off as a casualty of war, while DiCaprio’s Ferris must live with the consequences since he’s in the one being shot at & held accountable for Hoffman’s heartless decisions.
The film begins to make sense with the arrival of Mark Strong as the head of Jordan’s CIA counterpart, Hani Salaam. Strong, looking uncannily like Andy Garcia, plays the role exceptionally well; you’re never sure if he’s on ‘our’ side – ‘their’ side – or the most likely conclusion – he has his own agenda & you’re never sure what that entails... One thing is made perfectly clear, Salaam is not a man who want to have catch you in a lie – Even knowing this, Ferris decides to act on his own & runs the risk of being caught telling a whopper... This is where the movie switches from ‘at least I understand what’s going on now’ – to – ‘& not only that, it’s becoming an intriguing story’.
The biggest drawback to ‘Body Of Lies’ is the fact that most of Crowe & DiCaprio’s conversations take place over the phone – as the best scenes from an acting standpoint are when they are standing face to face, & there’s only a handful of those.
A love-interest is ‘tacked-on’ simply for plot reasons – Since Ferris hops from city to city & from partner to partner, he has no friends – no one that he would sacrifice anything to save, so Golshifteh Farahani (pronounced Shia Ioan LeBeouf Gruffudd) is introduced as Aisha, a nurse that tends to Ferris’s wounds after he is bitten by a rabid dog. When his cover is blown & the proverbial feces hits the fan, Ferris is forced to give himself up to the terrorist he’s been tracking in the hopes of saving her life after being photographed with him.
Everything ties together in the end & the finale is expertly written – from the way the terrorists ‘kidnap’ Ferris so that the CIA can’t follow him with their satellites – to the interrogation of Ferris by the ‘Bin Laden’ of this story. If you’ve paid attention to what was going on in the confusing beginning, you understand what happens at the end.
It took a long time for me to appreciate Leonardo DiCaprio’s ‘style’ of acting but he has hit three home runs in a row with this, “Blood Diamond” & “The Departed”. Not that he hasn’t been in other excellent films (“The Aviator” & “Gangs Of New York” come to mind) but he’s never impressed me with his acting ability until recently – the kid is a bona fide movie star now. Unlike Tom Cruise, he can go head to head with a Russell Crowe & hold his own, instead of being embarrassed by looking amateurish next to a Paul Newman (Color Of Money) or Jack Nicholson (A Few Good Men)
Russell Crowe’s performance isn’t that impressive but only due to the fact that he speaks most of his lines into a telephone that seems to be permanently glued in his ear – he shines when he’s in the same room with DiCaprio (& Strong) & even when he’s foiled by the bad guys & loses track of Ferris’ whereabouts, he delivers the words, “Sorry, kid,” with just a touch of actual regret & remorse – Yet you still get the feeling that he’s more concerned with who he will be able to get to replace Ferris in the field than he is with his fellow CIA agent’s safety...

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

On this one I am going to disagree with you a tad on this movie. It left me a little dissatisfied with some parts of the movie. I didn't like the ending. Why on earth would anyone with any common sense and was white and American, want to stay in the middle east ? You say it's because of the Muslim nurse ? That was another problem with the script. That is not even remotely realistic even for motion picture fantasy. First an American in the middle east wouldn't flirt with a woman over there in the first place. Second middle easterner's date within their own race, so she wouldn't have given him the time of day. Maybe not even eye contact. I have been to the middle east and that's how the women are.
So that makes that character to me obsolete. They could have figured out a better plot on how to capture Ferris? William Monahan is a better screenwriter than that. I'm not a professional screenwriter and I could come up with a better plot than that.
Russel Crowe's character, though somewhat limited, was a good foil to Ferris intensity. But I believe Mark Strong was the best actor in this movie. He owns every scene he is in. The Bainer guy has Crowe in his supporting category, whereas I would easily put Mark Strong in there instead.
I would still recommend the film, but there were parts that kind of made me unhappy with the plot.

Anonymous said...

Pretty concise review, and though I see movieluva disagrees with me on who was better in support, I say Crowe because he could have taken the character into a cliched way as a combatant towards Ferris.
I do take exception to your Tom Cruise slam. This is off topic but I felt he did hold his own in both A Few Good Men and Color Of Money. In Color, he did all his own pool tricks, which in turn really impressed Newman and where their tight friendship for many years later began. Also, Nicholson had made comments that he thought Tom did a very good job during his interrogation scene. There is trivia on it. I think the guy was very good in Born On The Fourth, The Last Samurai, Tropic Thunder, Jerry Maguire and The Firm. So much for that.
I thought BOL was what I thought it would be. It didn't disappoint me other than the unrealistic getting a rabies shot in the belly button and becoming smitten with a muslim nurse. That's pretty laughable. *** out of 5

Anonymous said...

I happily plead ignorance on both of your negative thoughts on 'Body Of Lies' as I have very little knowledge(Let's say none)on middle eastern customs & have never been given nor witnessed someone receiving a rabies shot.
Movieluva first, & I'm not arguing your points, they are valid, I'm just offering up a lame excuse as to why I dismissed the 'problems' you noticed (Okay?)
To answer your first question, why would anyone want to go the middle east in the First Place? I didn't think it was because of the nurse because he walked away after seeing her - I think his decision was more of not wanting to return to the U.S. than 'wanting' to stay in a third world country.
As far as the flirtation/eye contact, etc. - The nurse seemed very 'Americanized' to me - speaking excellent English - I don't remember if it was established that she had spent time in the U.S., but she didn't sound nor act like a typical middle eastern woman to me (& yet again, I confess, I don't really know what that entails) but the fact that she let her hair down when he came to dinner implied to me that she was different from most women of the region.
Having said that I agree that a different route toward bringing in Ferris would have made for a better story - as I stated, the nurse character seemed to be created for that one reason.
On Mark Strong vrs. Russell Crowe's performances, I agree with movieluva that Strong's was stronger for 2 reasons - his character was much more intense than Crowe's & #2 - How many films can you name where Russell gave a better performance? 7, 8, 9? How many past impressive showings does Mark Strong have? Let's cut the new guy some slack, KB, we 'expect' R.Crowe to give an Oscar caliber performance with every outing & this one isn't one of those. And by that I mean the role is more to blame than Russell's acting - he did an excellent job with what he was given, but too many scenes of him talking into a headset has to go in the minus column when adding up which character/performance was the more impressive.
On Tom Cruise, I thought he did his best acting in 'Collateral', with 'Last Samurai' being his only other 'impressive' performance. He knows how to shoot pool, so that makes him a good actor? Did you think about that line before you wrote it?
But hey, to each his own - I judge actors by their ability to make me believe they are the character they're playing & not someone reading their memorized lines - Tom Cruise doesn't do that for me -I see Tom Cruise on the screen every time(Except in the 2 I mentioned) & when have you EVER heard an actor say, "Yeah, I worked with 'So & So' in "A Few Good Men" & boy, did he suck! Would've been a great film if that hack knew how to act!"
Actors don't slam other actors (Unless you're Shirley MacLaine & the actor you're slamming recently died a tragic death after giving the greatest performance of his young career- Can't seem to let that one go, can I?)
But I appreciate your inputs & for making this blogsite more interesting for others to visit.
I thank you both.

Anonymous said...

You aren't even going to be swayed by the horses mouth huh ? The legend's opinion isn't good enough for you. And it is kind of acting playing a great pool player, he didn't have a stand in do those shots and considering he had to learn those trick shots that he didn't know in the first place is pretty impressive. That's like any actor doing research for a part. I thought him playing the young and cocky ( yet vulnerable ) Vincent was a total sell. And he also did a fine job of acting as Ron Kovic and the emotions he felt while coming back from Vietnam as a quad and then going into an alcoholic abyss for a long time before he pulled up his boot straps and stopped feeling sorry for himself and fought for Vietnam vets. I was really moved by that performance. I could put myself in that characters shoes. If Daniel Day-Lewis wouldn't have won the Oscar that year it would have been Cruise. I think he won the Golden Globe though.

Anonymous said...

Apparently Ridley Scott enjoys working with Russell Crowe; and he likes to make movies that raise international awareness (i'm thinking Blackhawk Down and Kingdom of Heaven)... that's a good thing i'd say

Anonymous said...

Yes, Ridley Scott and Russell Crowe are pretty tight. Much like the Di Niro/Scorsese friendship. It's a collaborator type thing. Like minds.
They are now in pre-production for their 5th movie called Nottingham. With Crowe playing Robin Hood and Sienna Miller as Maid Marion, also starring William Hurt, Vanessa Redgrave and Gordon Pinset ( last seen as the husband in Away From Her )
oscartracker.blogspot.com

Anonymous said...

I hope you know I have a great deal of respect for your opinion, but saying Tom Cruise is an
impressive actor because he learned a few trick pool shots is like saying Jamie Foxx is a
master thespian because he put on a pair of sunglasses & looked a lot like Ray Charles...
Not everyone has the same criteria for what makes an actor 'great'. For me, it's someone that
doesn't look/sound like they're reading their memorized lines. It's someone who stays in
character even when they aren't speaking & someone that can convey what their character is
thinking/feeling without speaking. That's what I look for under the basic umbrella of 'Make me
believe you ARE the person you're playing. Tom Cruise doesn't do that. He came probably did
his best acting in "Collateral" & "Last Samurai" but he still didn't totally immerse himself in those roles either. In my opinion he simply can't do what I require of an actor to make him great in my mind. If you buy into his characters, that's fine - I don't have a problem with it... I'd wonder if you were into scientology, but I wouldn't have a problem with it... We all have different criteria, right?
& if Paul Newman had ever made a statement such as, "You know, that Jimmy Garner, he's a nice fellow & all, but I'm sorry to say he isn't much of an actor" or, "You can really tell that Bob Redford is somewhat of a hack, especially when he's onscreen with yours truly" Then I'd take some
credence into him saying Tom Cruise is a fine actor. But he never said anything negative about anyone & that's why he's one of the most beloved Americans that ever lived. One of our greatest actors & a humanitarian. I feel fortunate to have lived at a time when I could see & appreciate
his talent. & one final thought on Cruise - I have always given the guy credit for having the gumption to act against greats such as Newman, Nicholson & Hoffman knowing he was going to look 'weak' in their presence.
I'm not into making predictions like this, but after seeing the preview for 'Austrailia' - it looks
like the kind of film that wins Best Picture Oscars... You heard it here first (Unless oscartracker.blogspot.com beat me to it)

Anonymous said...

We'll have to disagree to disagree. Though of any of Cruise performances, I think he best sell was Born On The 4th.
Anyway, Leo is Scorsese's go to guy as of now, but never do De Niro and Scorsese ever stop looking into possible prospects and they have said before their too old ( which should be soon ) they will collaborate at least once more. It's clear Scorsese does have his favorites. And Leo is catching up to Robert.

De Niro- Mean Streets, Taxi Driver, NY,NY, Raging Bull, King Of Comedy, Good Fellas, Cape Fear, Casino.
DiCaprio- GONY, The Aviator, The Departed, Shutter Island ( 09 ) The Rise Of Teddy Roosevelt ( 10 )
Harvey Keitel- Mean Streets, Alice Doesn't Live Hear Anymore, Taxi Driver, The Last Tempation Of Christ.
Joe Pesci- Raging Bull, Good Fellas, Casino.
Frank Vincent- Same as Pesci.
Daniel Day-Lewis- The Age Of Innocence, GONY. And personally I'd like to see Scorsese reunite with Day-Lewis with either Bardem or Penn in Silence, a pet project that Scorsese has wanted to do for years and is on his itinerary.
Oh, and did you know that Scorsese is doing a George Harrison biopic as we speak ? Cheers on that one !